As respiratory diseases rise, EPA tightens air quality standards

The agency’s new rules would help clean the nation’s air and bring it more in line with the past decade of research on the harmful effects of particulate matter. “Neither an individual’s skin color nor the wealth of their ZIP code should determine whether they have clean air to breathe, safe water to drink, or healthy environments in which their children can play,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said in May, the Washington Informer reported.

But health advocates say the agency’s proposed change doesn’t go far enough to protect the public.

The EPA’s rule comes as asthma and other chronic diseases, particularly respiratory ones, are steadily rising. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a leading cause of death in the U.S., and asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions in children.

“Particulate matter is widespread and we know that it’s deadly. The science is very clear,” said Laura Kate Bender, national assistant vice president of Healthy Air at American Lung Association.

This is the first time in a decade that the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter will be changed, since in 2020 federal regulators under the Trump administration opted to keep rules from 2013 (a decision that drew criticism and lawsuits). By law, the EPA’s air quality standards must be reviewed every five years.

And yet, even under a new administration that has said it will center environmental justice, critics say the EPA is proposing maximum levels of pollution above what years of research deems safe.

Particulate matter refers to tiny particles that float through the air and can be breathed in, residue from dusty manufacturing sites and burns, as well as other sources. Two types of particulate matter are of significant concern to the EPA: particles with a diameter of 10 microns or less, called PM10, and those 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5).

Both have been shown to cause short-term and long-term harm, and are especially risky for pregnant people, babies and children, older adults, and people with lung or heart disease. Fine particles, those 2.5 microns or less, are especially dangerous, and can increase chances of premature death, heart attacks, and strokes.

People who live in low-income communities and people of color are disproportionately affected by particulate-matter-laden air, a result of neighborhoods located near major polluters, like factories, ports, and highways.

Much of the debate around these air quality rules comes down to two numbers that dictate how many bits of pollution can be in a cubic meter of air. One number sets an annual average for how much particulate pollution can be in the air, and another sets a higher, 24-hour average, which accounts for spikes and lulls. Both of these numbers are used by federal authorities to monitor air quality, send out alerts, and crack down on major polluters. Because the air quality standards are governed by the Clean Air Act, the EPA is legally required to act based narrowly on up-to-date scientific evidence — whatever is in the best interest of public health.

The current standard, from 2013, says there can be up to 12 micrograms of fine particulate matter (the smaller particles) per cubic meter on an average day, annually. Both the EPA and its independent panel of scientific advisers, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, as well as many health and environmental groups, agreed that number must drop to protect people’s health. The EPA suggests 9 to 10 micrograms per cubic meter in its proposal.

But the consensus ends there. The American Lung Association and other groups are pushing for a maximum of 8 micrograms of fine particles as the annual standard.

Further, the EPA’s proposed policy suggests keeping the same standards otherwise. That means, in a 24-hour span, there could be up to 35 micrograms per cubic meter of air for fine particles, and 150 micrograms per cubic meter for larger particles.

Critics argue that is much too high, noting that 25 to 30 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter in a day was the range recommended by the independent advisory group in a report last year.

The EPA will receive public comments for 60 days before finalizing its new rules, so the standards could still change. Pushback from industry groups that find the standards heavy-handed is expected. The EPA’s own report estimated it would cost upward of $65 billion each year in the 2020s to meet Clean Air Act amendment rules, but it also said that economic benefits would far outweigh those costs. Bender said she is still hopeful the agency will lower its numbers.

In its annual “State of the Air” report, the American Lung Association found Americans experienced more days of “very unhealthy” and “hazardous” air quality between 2019 and 2021 than at any other time in the past two decades. Other research has shown great disparities in air quality across the nation, even during the pandemic lockdowns, when fewer cars were on the roads. A recent retrospective study on children with nonviral asthma showed a link between lower air quality days in urban areas and asthma attacks, and pointed to PM2.5 as a major driver of inflammation in children’s airways.

“We keep seeing with emerging science that this pollutant is dangerous in more ways and at lower levels than previously thought,” Bender said.

STAT’s coverage of chronic health issues is supported by a grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies. Our financial supporters are not involved in any decisions about our journalism.

Get your daily dose of health and medicine every weekday with STAT’s free newsletter Morning Rounds. Sign up here.

lisa1 lisa2 lisa3 lisa4 lisa5 lisa6 lisa7 lisa8 lisa9 lisa10 lisa11 lisa12 lisa13 lisa14 lisa15 lisa16 lisa17 lisa18 lisa19 lisa20 lisa21 lisa22 lisa23 lisa24 lisa25 lisa26 lisa27 lisa28 lisa29 lisa30 lisa31 lisa32 lisa33 lisa34 lisa35 lisa36 lisa37 lisa38 lisa39 lisa40 lisa41 lisa42 lisa43 lisa44 lisa45 lisa46 lisa47 lisa48 lisa49 lisa50 lisa51 lisa52 lisa53 lisa54 lisa55 lisa56 lisa57 lisa58 lisa59 lisa60 lisa61 lisa62 lisa63 lisa64 lisa65 lisa66 lisa67 lisa68 lisa69 lisa70 lisa71 lisa72 lisa73 lisa74 lisa75 lisa76 lisa77 lisa78 lisa79 lisa80 lisa81 lisa82 lisa83 lisa84 lisa85 lisa86 lisa87 lisa88 lisa89 lisa90 lisa91 lisa92 lisa93 lisa94 lisa95 lisa96 lisa97 lisa98 lisa99 lisa100 lisa101 lisa102 lisa103 lisa104 lisa105 lisa106 lisa107 lisa108 lisa109 lisa110 lisa111 lisa112 lisa113 lisa114 lisa115 lisa116 lisa117 lisa118 lisa119 lisa120 lisa121 lisa122 lisa123 lisa124 lisa125 lisa126 lisa127 lisa128 lisa129 lisa130 lisa131 lisa132 lisa133 lisa134 lisa135 lisa136 lisa137 lisa138 lisa139 lisa140 lisa141 lisa142 lisa143 lisa144 lisa145 lisa146 lisa147 lisa148 lisa149 lisa150 lisa151 lisa152 lisa153 lisa154 lisa155 lisa156 lisa157 lisa158 lisa159 lisa160 lisa161 lisa162 lisa163 lisa164 lisa165 lisa166 lisa167 lisa168 lisa169 lisa170 lisa171 lisa172 lisa173 lisa174 lisa175 lisa176 lisa177 lisa178 lisa179 lisa180 lisa181 lisa182 lisa183 lisa184 lisa185 lisa186 lisa187 lisa188 lisa189 lisa190 lisa191 lisa192 lisa193 lisa194 lisa195 lisa196 lisa197 lisa198 lisa199 lisa200 lisa201 lisa202 lisa203 lisa204 lisa205 lisa206 lisa207 lisa208 lisa209 lisa210

NewToNews

As respiratory diseases rise, EPA tightens air quality standards

Byolaksjl

By olaksjl

Related Post

All hormonal contraceptives increase breast cancer risk: Study

Antibiotics do not reduce risk of dying in adults hospitalised with common respiratory infections, suggests study

Women are more likely to experience long-term anxiety after cardiac arrest than men

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You missed

All SAEs including death should be reported: CDSCO Panel tells AstraZeneca about Durvalumab

Meta Pixel offers benefits, risks for practice website management

CDSCO panel tells Laurus Labs on Carglumic Acid Dispersible Tablets

US federal court ruling could result in 2,000 new HIV infections among MSM each year

NewToNews